tr.im goes out of business

screenshot14

Without trying to sound too bitter about it, tr.im announced today that they’re no longer offering their services in the URL shortening war against bit.ly and TinyURL:

tr.im is now in the process of discontinuing service, effective immediately.

Statistics can no longer be considered reliable, or reliably available going forward.
However, all tr.im links will continue to redirect, and will do so until at least December 31, 2009.
Your tweets with tr.im URLs in them will not be affected.

We regret that it came to this, but all of our efforts to avoid it failed.
No business we approached wanted to purchase tr.im for even a minor amount.

There is no way for us to monetize URL shortening — users won’t pay for it — and we just can’t
justify further devleopment since Twitter has all but annointed bit.ly the market winner.
There is simply no point for us to continue operating tr.im, and pay for its upkeep.

We apologize for the disruption and inconvenience this may cause you.

It truly is unfortunate as I really liked their services with reporting and statistics, though the site was 90% visual fluff and the offering was otherwise no different from bit.ly or TinyURL. Now I just have to find a way to apologize to the clients that I recommended their services to.

NetworkSolutions Goes Backwards

screenshot13

One of most important parts of my job is to work with clients to make their designs simpler, cleaner and more intuitive. I take no greater pride than seeing the evolution of  a print or web piece from a rough internal concept, riddled with arcane messages or esoteric ideas, to a clear, consistent promotion. I work with clients to meticulously hone down verbiage and copy to best communicate their offerings. Oftentimes, the back-and-forth discussion reveals even stronger concepts that prospective clients understand easier/faster and my clients marvel at the clarity of their image.

This is why I wonder what was going through NetworkSolutions’ minds when they recently redesigned their web site. It isn’t just the organization that suffers as they’ve transformed their image to look like every other registrar out there. They’ve also attempted to rebrand the products that each registrar sells (domains, sites , email accounts) with nsWebAddress™, nsSpace™ and nsMail™. Not only does this do nothing to increase customers’ understanding of their services, it also seems to be intentionally misleading. Hosting is commonly called “space” in the industry, however to NetworkSolutions, nsSpace™ is a web site, not web space. They’re no longer referring to SSL Certificates as the industry standard but rather nsProtect™. So when our clients go to manage their eCommerce accounts, and they want to buy or renew their certificates, they have no idea where to go or what to do. They may also, inadvertanly, let the renewal lapse because they’re not aware that nsProtect™ is a SSL Certificate. This is especially a problem when other registrars refer to private registration as Protection Services as it impedes Spambots from aggregating users’ private registration data.

whatsnew-ad-topThe complete list of their changes (the “most obvious” ones, they say) are to the left, listed under the guise of doing it in the name of customer requests. As if attempting to brand the most generic of registrar services, while also creating a whole host of new miscommunication/renewal issues, can be attributed to any customer request.

I have to wonder who coerced NetworkSolutions, a company already losing ground to registrars with less expensive services (Such as GoDaddy.com), to make their online presence so obscure that new customers could feasibly leave them when they don’t see “SSL Certificates” or “Domains” as products they even offer. It’s scenarios like this when I really become happy to work within a company that respects clarity of offering and strong, consistent communication to target audiences.

Flash Indexing with External Resource Loading

flashFrom Google’s Webmaster Central:
We just added external resource loading to our Flash indexing capabilities. This means that when a SWF file loads content from some other file—whether it’s text, HTML, XML, another SWF, etc.—we can index this external content too, and associate it with the parent SWF file and any documents that embed it.

This new capability improves search quality by allowing relevant content contained in external resources to appear in response to users’ queries. For example, this result currently comes up in response to the query [2002 VW Transporter 888]:

t4-tranformations-search-result
Read the entire story, here»

Flash File Uploader – Allow All Filetypes

flashfileuploader

A [d]online reader recently requested that the Flash File Uploader allow provision to upload all filetypes. And while I’d previously decided against such an option—due to security/malicious action issues, this was not the first time I received such a request. In fact, since the uploader was created a few years back, I’ve gotten dozens of requests for this feature. As such, I’ve decided that my disclaimer for downloading the uploader should adequately cover me from any litigation and wrote the feature into the latest version of the uploader.

For people wishing to just use the uploader without understanding the changes, simply add “all” as an item under the extensions flash variable in the swfobject embed code:

fo.addVariable("types", "video|text|pdf|audio|archive|office|image|all");

For those that wish to know the changes, the Flash loop that adds the array extensions to the “allowed” list also looks for the “all” option and changes a variable to true, if all filetypes are allowed. This is then passed to “upload.php” and skips the extensions test. Lastly, it’s passed to index.php to properly display the success message.

For your convenience, the link is the same as the last one.

Comments and feedback always welcome. Thanks again, Mike, for the assistance and to all the [d]online readers and commenters for your interest in the FFU and readership.

The Vendor-Client Relationship – in Real-world Situations

I found this video as torturous as it was funny, for various reasons, but figure that most of my colleagues would get a good kick out of it. Especially on the heels of the Win Without Pitching manifesto—which friends and [d]online readers replied in unison ‘In a perfect world…”—these two posts have really made me stand back and think about how our industry differs from many others.

That’s all I feel comfortable saying on the subject, in such a public forum, though.